Skip to main content

Creating a Change Order: With vs. Without a Potential Change Request

In Buildend, change orders can be created in two ways:

  1. By converting a Potential Change Request (PCR) into a change order

  2. By creating a change order directly, without first creating a PCR

The choice depends on how you want to manage documentation, review, and approvals for changes.


1. Creating a Change Order With a Potential Change Request

Use this method when changes need to be tracked, reviewed, and priced before being formally issued as a change order.

Workflow:

  • Start with a Potential Change Request

  • PCR goes through review and approval process

  • Once the PCR is in a Closed/Approved state → convert it into a Change Order

  • All costs, references (RFIs, tasks), and supporting documentation flow automatically into the change order

  • Keeps a full history linking the PCR to the final change order

Benefits:

  • Provides traceability of the entire change process

  • Useful for changes requiring input from subcontractors/vendors (RFQs)

  • Maintains a clear audit trail for owners and stakeholders


2. Creating a Change Order Without a Potential Change Request

Use this method when the scope, cost, and impact of the change are already well-defined and don’t need a preliminary PCR stage.

Workflow:

  • Navigate directly to Financials → Change Orders

  • Click + Create Change Order

  • Select type: Prime Contract CO, Subcontract CO, or Purchase Order CO

  • Fill in details, add schedule impacts, references, and line items

  • Approve to make the change order active and billable

Benefits:

  • Faster process for straightforward changes

  • Ideal for smaller changes or when prior review/quotations are not needed

  • Less documentation overhead


Key Differences at a Glance

Feature

With PCR

Without PCR

Starting Point

Potential Change Request

Directly in Change Orders

Approval Needed Before CO

Yes, PCR must be Closed/Approved

No, created directly

Traceability

Maintains full link to PCR and references

References can still be added manually

Use Case

Complex changes requiring review/quotations

Simple or well-defined changes

Speed

Longer, structured workflow

Faster, direct entry


Choosing the Right Method

  • Use With PCR for major or complex changes that need review, collaboration, or vendor input.

  • Use Without PCR for straightforward or urgent changes where costs and scope are already known.

Did this answer your question?